In response to the Leader of East Devon District Council, Paul Diviani, calling an extraordinary meeting of the Council on 25 March to stream roller through a decision to sell off its Headquarters at the Knowle, Councillor Claire Wright http://www.claire-wright.org/ has written to him and the Chief Executive, Mark Williams.
Claire Wright is calling
upon Councillor
“Kim Jung Un” Diviani not to push for this decision to be taken ahead of
an imminent decision (on 27 March, two days after the Council meeting) by the
Information Commissioner on whether key documents relating to the sale of the
Knowle can be made public. Claire Wright
is also citing the impending purdah period (after which the Council cannot take
significant new decisions until after the May elections) that starts on 31 March.
The Knowle. It is owned by the residents of East Devon..... |
Councillor Wright is absolutely correct to make these challenges as these two significant dates take place 2 and 6 days respectively after the District Council’s majority Conservative group look set to push through the decision to sell the Knowle.
Clr "Kim Jong Un" Diviani. ....absolutely determined to bulldoze through sale of the Knowle. |
This is the
text of Claire Wright’s request to
Paul
Diviani –
“When I was reviewing the answers to the written questions at Wednesday’s full council meeting last evening, I realised that the judgement on key reports of the state of the Knowle that the Information Commissioner has ruled must be public, will be made two days after the decision on the office relocation.
The move to schedule an
extraordinary meeting to make a final decision on unpopular office relocation,
just a few days before purdah and the council elections - seems to me and many
people to be profoundly undemocratic and quite wrong, as I outlined in my
speech at full council on Wednesday evening.
But the fact that a decision
on publishing key reports on the state of the Knowle buildings won’t be made
until two days later, deeply compounds that wrong.
Given that a tribunal hearing
took place on this issue last August, we all reasonably expected to receive the
judgement long before now and most definitely before any decision on office
relocation was made.
Neither were we expecting a
decision on the move to be forced through with such alacrity before the
elections.
The decision on office
relocation being made without the benefit of the outcome of the judgement being
known means that councillors cannot refer to those key reports, unless the
debate takes place with the public and press excluded. A move that would be
quite unacceptable on a decision of such magnitude.
It also means that members of
the public would not have any sight of such documents until it was too late for
them to consider them and make representations at any such meeting.
There are now surely
overwhelming reasons to suspend a decision on the office relocation until AFTER the elections.
I hope that the council will
consider its own reputation on this matter, and be fair to its councillors –
and its electorate – the people who effectively own the Knowle buildings – and
are likely to pay dearly for any relocation – and defer the decision.
I urge the council to suspend
this process and review again after 7 May”.
If on 25 March, as we expect, the Conservative majority group bulldoze through the sale of the Knowle, electors will need to exact their revenge on 7 May .....
If on 25 March, as we expect, the Conservative majority group bulldoze through the sale of the Knowle, electors will need to exact their revenge on 7 May .....
This box exacts revenge on arrogant politicians. |
It is really disappointing that none of the cabinet stand up to Kim. They must accept the consequences in May.
ReplyDelete