Claire Wright was elected for interview as the piece being broadcast,
to coincide with the presentation today to Parliament on options for the
current issue of “English votes for
English people”. In the broadcast package, which concentrated on whether as
part of the move towards greater devolved powers within the various UK
countries it perhaps was now necessary to consider greater devolution to
English Regions.
Within this broadcast piece, which prefaced a live interview with the
ex-Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott, Claire Wright was the only elected representative
who was interviewed. This was due to the fact that she has a proven track
record of fighting for local electors interests and because she is an elected
Councillor, as well as someone who is standing to be elected as an MP.
Being chosen for interview was truly a great accolade for Claire
Wright. You can bet that the #EDDC Conservative Councillors and their MP Hugo Swire
must have been cursing her and that bastion of leftist propaganda, the BBC. Some
choking on tea and toast must have reverberated across their breakfast tables
as Claire Wright broadcast to the nation over the radio waves!
In Claire Wright’s interview which took place in Councillor Twiss’ own
backyard in West Hill, she explained why she entered politics originally and
why she now felt the need to stand as an independent in next year’s general
election. And what was the issue that motivated Claire Wright to become
politically active? Yes, you guessed correctly, planning issues! The issue
still is at the heart of Claire’s campaigning locally.
Claire Wright starts being interviewed at 2 hours 12 minutes & 16
seconds in. The whole package ends, just ahead of the John Prescott interview,
at 2 hours 16 minutes 10 seconds.
Listen to your next local MP on
the radio!
Claire Wright today blogged about an issue that related to her
interview at – http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/planning_law_policy_fuels_inappropriate_development.
Claire’s blog article is “Planning
law policy ‘fuels inappropriate development’”.
Yesterday Claire Wright
trailed her interview, again on her blog under the understated heading “BBC Radio 4 Today Programme debut” – http://www.claire-wright.org/index.php/post/bbc_today_programme_debut.
Hugo Swire or
Councillor Paul Diviani must have turned down the opportunity to be interviewed in order
to help Claire Wright in her election campaign!

Who makes these decisions?
Free and open for all of to have an opportunity to buy not just a few... The money spent on this is beyond belief....if it was a private firm who had made the wrong decisions and wasted the money...they would be out of the business.
We just keep voting for them! With further cutbacks in public services you may find that the two sites may be over capacity...crazy...
Then sell off the old part of the Knowle and the bits of the grounds where they already proposed to build some new housing. The proceeds from that sale would help towards the refurbishment of the existing newer offices.
Keep the business centre in Honiton open and keep the rents coming from there and wait until a good market time to sell it off for development.
Sell the Manstone depot to a housing association for affordable homes.
I really can't see a problem with parking..because most new offices built don't provide enough parking for all staff and older premises on main roads often don't have parking. The employee either has to find parking (like employees who work in Fields/shops in Sidmouth) themselves...should not be an issue.
He claims that they didn't change their minds about where to move to, that Sky Park was their first choice.
It will also cost £10, 000, 000 for the move he says, this is far more than they originally said (to the best of my recollection). It is all so stupid. I wish they would just stop.
If the move will be 'cost neutral' over 20 years then that is 20 years of increased taxes to pay for the money borrowed before it is all paid off. It is madness in the face of current needs for cutbacks and people struggling to make ends meet.
I certainly won't see any benefit when it is paid off as I'll be gone by then. This would not be a problem if I thought it would be of benefit to the next generations but from what I can see it will just leave Sidmouth with more pressure on facilities and less employment opportunities.
It makes no sense, employment and housing are supposed to go hand in hand; not least because it is 'green' to reduce the travel needed from home to work.
All welcome.